↓ Skip to main content

River ecosystem processes: A synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
471 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
River ecosystem processes: A synthesis of approaches, criteria of use and sensitivity to environmental stressors
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.081
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel von Schiller, Vicenç Acuña, Ibon Aristi, Maite Arroita, Ana Basaguren, Alberto Bellin, Luz Boyero, Andrea Butturini, Antoni Ginebreda, Eleni Kalogianni, Aitor Larrañaga, Bruno Majone, Aingeru Martínez, Silvia Monroy, Isabel Muñoz, Momir Paunović, Olatz Pereda, Mira Petrovic, Jesús Pozo, Sara Rodríguez-Mozaz, Daniel Rivas, Sergi Sabater, Francesc Sabater, Nikolaos Skoulikidis, Libe Solagaistua, Leonidas Vardakas, Arturo Elosegi

Abstract

River ecosystems are subject to multiple stressors that affect their structure and functioning. Ecosystem structure refers to characteristics such as channel form, water quality or the composition of biological communities, whereas ecosystem functioning refers to processes such as metabolism, organic matter decomposition or secondary production. Structure and functioning respond in contrasting and complementary ways to environmental stressors. Moreover, assessing the response of ecosystem functioning to stressors is critical to understand the effects on the ecosystem services that produce direct benefits to humans. Yet, there is more information on structural than on functional parameters, and despite the many approaches available to measure river ecosystem processes, structural approaches are more widely used, especially in management. One reason for this discrepancy is the lack of synthetic studies analyzing river ecosystem functioning in a way that is useful for both scientists and managers. Here, we present a synthesis of key river ecosystem processes, which provides a description of the main characteristics of each process, including criteria guiding their measurement as well as their respective sensitivity to stressors. We also discuss the current limitations, potential improvements and future steps that the use of functional measures in rivers needs to face.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 466 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 89 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 18%
Student > Master 69 15%
Other 29 6%
Student > Bachelor 28 6%
Other 67 14%
Unknown 103 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 179 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 4%
Engineering 17 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 145 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2022.
All research outputs
#831,685
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#1,088
of 30,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,778
of 325,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#14
of 393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.