↓ Skip to main content

How People Use Rich Pictures to Help Them Think and Act

Overview of attention for article published in Systemic Practice and Action Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 140)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How People Use Rich Pictures to Help Them Think and Act
Published in
Systemic Practice and Action Research, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11213-012-9236-x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 261 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Researcher 16 6%
Other 51 19%
Unknown 86 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 49 18%
Social Sciences 33 12%
Computer Science 24 9%
Engineering 19 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 88 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,655,327
of 24,590,593 outputs
Outputs from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#26
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,968
of 170,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,590,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.