↓ Skip to main content

Exploring Care Transitions From Patient, Caregiver, and Health-Care Provider Perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nursing Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exploring Care Transitions From Patient, Caregiver, and Health-Care Provider Perspectives
Published in
Clinical Nursing Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1177/1054773812465084
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Care transitions involve coordination of patient care across multiple care settings. Many problems occur during care transitions resulting in negative patient outcomes and unnecessary readmissions. The purpose of this study was to describe the experience of care transitions from patient, caregiver, and health-care provider perspectives in a single metropolitan Midwest city. A qualitative descriptive design was used to solicit patients', caregivers', and health-care providers' perceptions of care transitions, their role within the process, barriers to effective care transitions, and strategies to overcome these barriers. Five themes emerged: preplanned admissions are ideal; lack of needed patient information upon admission; multiple services are needed in preparing patients for discharge; rushed or delayed discharges lead to patient misunderstanding; and difficulties in following aftercare instructions. Findings illustrated provider difficulty in meeting multiple care needs, and the need for patient-centered care to achieve positive outcomes associated with quality measures, reduced readmissions, and care transitions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Other 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 18%
Social Sciences 13 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,279,794
of 28,583,110 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nursing Research
#80
of 471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,990
of 211,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nursing Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,583,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them