↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Interruptions, Distractions, and Cognitive Load on Procedure Failures and Medication Administration Errors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nursing Care Quality, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 958)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of Interruptions, Distractions, and Cognitive Load on Procedure Failures and Medication Administration Errors
Published in
Journal of Nursing Care Quality, October 2017
DOI 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000256
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Medication administration errors are difficult to intercept since they occur at the end of the process. The study describes interruptions, distractions, and cognitive load experienced by registered nurses during medication administration and explores their impact on procedure failures and medication administration errors. The focus of this study was unique as it investigated how known individual and environmental factors interacted and culminated in errors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Student > Master 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 62 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 52 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Psychology 8 5%
Engineering 7 4%
Unspecified 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 65 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2025.
All research outputs
#1,581,014
of 28,723,084 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nursing Care Quality
#13
of 958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,015
of 338,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nursing Care Quality
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,723,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 958 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.