↓ Skip to main content

FOXC1 Duplications—New Mutations and Clinical Features in an Old Glaucoma Gene

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Ophthalmology, June 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
bluesky
1 Bluesky user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
FOXC1 Duplications—New Mutations and Clinical Features in an Old Glaucoma Gene
Published in
JAMA Ophthalmology, June 2026
DOI 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.1304
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2026.
All research outputs
#22,303,291
of 34,343,841 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Ophthalmology
#3,417
of 4,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,427
of 357,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Ophthalmology
#73
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,343,841 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.