↓ Skip to main content

Thalamic projections sustain prefrontal activity during working memory maintenance

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
65 X users
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
800 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Thalamic projections sustain prefrontal activity during working memory maintenance
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, May 2017
DOI 10.1038/nn.4568
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The mediodorsal thalamus (MD) shares reciprocal connectivity with the prefrontal cortex (PFC), and decreased MD-PFC connectivity is observed in schizophrenia patients. Patients also display cognitive deficits including impairments in working memory, but a mechanistic link between thalamo-prefrontal circuit function and working memory is missing. Using pathway-specific inhibition, we found directional interactions between mouse MD and medial PFC (mPFC), with MD-to-mPFC supporting working memory maintenance and mPFC-to-MD supporting subsequent choice. We further identify mPFC neurons that display elevated spiking during the delay, a feature that was absent on error trials and required MD inputs for sustained maintenance. Strikingly, delay-tuned neurons had minimal overlap with spatially tuned neurons, and each mPFC population exhibited mutually exclusive dependence on MD and hippocampal inputs. These findings indicate a role for MD in sustaining prefrontal activity during working memory maintenance. Consistent with this idea, we found that enhancing MD excitability was sufficient to enhance task performance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 800 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 789 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 192 24%
Researcher 146 18%
Student > Master 78 10%
Student > Bachelor 56 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 5%
Other 109 14%
Unknown 178 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 323 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 14%
Psychology 54 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 3%
Other 49 6%
Unknown 213 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2026.
All research outputs
#564,733
of 34,201,986 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#998
of 6,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,808
of 355,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#14
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,201,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.