Articular cartilage and bony contact at the distal tibiofibular cartilage contact zone (TFCCZ) is variable. The appropriate placement of syndesmotic hardware would benefit from a more accurate characterization of the proximal extent of the TFCCZ allowing surgeons to place hardware that simultaneously improves biomechanical stability and decreases the risk of iatrogenic cartilage damage. In addition, Ilizarov wire fixation through the distal fibula and tibia can pass through the syndesmosis recess. Anatomically defining the proximal extent of this recess can help decrease the risk of inadvertent capsular penetration. This study anatomically defines the TFCCZ and syndesmosis recess establishing a safe and biomechanically advantageous distance from the plafond for orthopedic fixation. This study measured the height of the TFCCZ and the syndesmotic recess in 3158 anatomical and cadaveric specimens. A TFCCZ was present in 59% of the Robert J. Terry Anatomical Collection specimens. Maximal height of the TFCCZ averaged 5.7±1.7 mm (99% confidence interval [CI], 5.6-5.8 mm) for anatomical specimens and 5.6±1.6 mm (99% CI, 4.6-6.5 mm) for cadaveric dissections. The maximum TFCCZ height was 11.71 mm. Maximal height of the syndesmotic recess averaged 12.8±2.1 mm for anatomical specimens and 13.7±2.7 mm for cadaveric specimens. The "3 cm rule" appears to be appropriate for fine wire fixation accounting for capsular distension that can be associated with injuries but not applicable for syndesmotic fixation. There is a less than 0.1% chance of encountering the TFCCZ cartilage at 10.9 mm above the plafond and a less than 0.01% chance at 12 mm above the plafond. [Orthopedics. 201x; xx(x):xx-xx.].
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,771,544
of 27,248,354 outputs
Outputs from Orthopedics
#1,386
of 2,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,897
of 422,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthopedics
#42
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,248,354 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
