↓ Skip to main content

The prevalence of pain and its relationship to falls, fatigue, and depression in a cohort of older people living in the community

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Advanced Nursing, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The prevalence of pain and its relationship to falls, fatigue, and depression in a cohort of older people living in the community
Published in
Journal of Advanced Nursing, May 2017
DOI 10.1111/jan.13328
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To examine the relationship of the pain severity scores with demographic variables (age, gender and ethnicity) and with the frequency of falls, fatigue and depression in a very large New Zealand sample of people over 65 years assessed using the Home Care International Residential Assessment Instrument. Pain is reported to be highly prevalent in older people yet it is poorly correlated with tissue damage. There is convincing evidence that it is related to depression and some evidence of its relationship with fatigue and falls. This is a cross-sectional study examining a national cohort assessed on referral for a needs assessment for access to publicly funded service provision or support. Participants were 45418 adults aged over 65 years referred for a mandatory needs assessment between 2012 - 2014. All variables analysed were drawn from the Home Care International Residential Assessment Instrument. Univariate descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample in relation to the association of severe pain with age, gender and ethnicity and with the key variables of interest: falls, fatigue and depression. Logistic regression models were used to examine the relationship of the presence or not of severe pain with the other key health-related variables: falls, fatigue and depression respectively, after controlling for the presence of age, gender and ethnicity. Odds ratios are reported to quantify the difference in risk with increasing severity of falls, fatigue and depression. The mean age of the cohort was 82.48 years (SD 7.48) and 48.5% of the sample reported experiencing daily pain. The rates of severe daily pain were 12-18% with those in the 65-74 years group having the highest reported rate of severe pain (18%) and a gradual decrease in severe pain with age. After co-varying for age, ethnicity and gender, the presence of severe daily pain was predicted by increasing frequency of falls and fatigue and having current depression. While two-thirds reported their pain control was adequate, a third reported that their pain control was not adequate despite adhering to a therapeutic regime. The study highlights how pervasive pain is in this group and its correlation with falls, fatigue and depression. While the effect sizes were relatively small the results may be clinically significant and it may be clinically important that the presence of pain in older people could indicate the need for further nursing assessment in relation to falls, fatigue and depression. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 32 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Psychology 9 9%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 40 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#26,441,215
of 31,721,033 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#6,783
of 7,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,165
of 347,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Advanced Nursing
#57
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,721,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.