↓ Skip to main content

The change of the interpretation of the Japanese agricultural proverb “A good farmer removes weeds before seeing weeds”

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Weed Science and Technology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 105)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The change of the interpretation of the Japanese agricultural proverb “A good farmer removes weeds before seeing weeds”
Published in
Journal of Weed Science and Technology, January 2015
DOI 10.3719/weed.60.54
Authors

Reiichi Miura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,502,398
of 25,074,338 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Weed Science and Technology
#3
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,257
of 364,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Weed Science and Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,074,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them