↓ Skip to main content

Mortality among Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 versus Non-USA300 Invasive Infections: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mortality among Patients with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 versus Non-USA300 Invasive Infections: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), May 2016
DOI 10.1086/674385
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has been found to be epidemiologically and microbiologically distinct from healthcare-associated MRSA. Most CA-MRSA infections are not invasive; however, fatal outcomes have been reported among healthy people with CA-MRSA invasive infections. Epidemiological studies have attributed a major burden of CA-MRSA infections in the United States to the predominant clone USA300. We investigated the association between USA300 invasive infections and mortality by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that reported mortality rates associated with USA300 strains.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 18%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2013.
All research outputs
#28,604,603
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#5,667
of 6,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,822
of 337,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#750
of 796 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 796 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.