↓ Skip to main content

Getting Surgery Right

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Getting Surgery Right
Published in
Annals of Surgery, September 2007
DOI 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181469987
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We sought to identify factors contributing to wrong-site surgery (wrong patient, procedure, side, or part).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Uruguay 1 2%
Unknown 61 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2025.
All research outputs
#2,630,724
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#1,799
of 11,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,336
of 114,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.