↓ Skip to main content

近代武道教授法の確立過程に関する研究(二)

Overview of attention for article published in Research Journal of Budo, March 1981
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 240)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
近代武道教授法の確立過程に関する研究(二)
Published in
Research Journal of Budo, March 1981
DOI 10.11214/budo1968.13.3_10
Authors

中村 民雄

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,963,683
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Research Journal of Budo
#32
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,689
of 6,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Journal of Budo
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them