↓ Skip to main content

HIV‐protease inhibitors for the treatment of cancer: Repositioning HIV protease inhibitors while developing more potent NO‐hybridized derivatives?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Cancer, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HIV‐protease inhibitors for the treatment of cancer: Repositioning HIV protease inhibitors while developing more potent NO‐hybridized derivatives?
Published in
International Journal of Cancer, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/ijc.30529
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danijela Maksimovic‐Ivanic, Paolo Fagone, James McCubrey, Klaus Bendtzen, Sanja Mijatovic, Ferdinando Nicoletti

Abstract

The possible use of HIV protease inhibitors (HIV-PI) as new therapeutic option for the treatment of cancer primarily originated from their success in treating HIV-related Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). While these findings were initially attributed to immune reconstitution and better control of oncogenic viral infections, the number of reports on solid tumors, KS, lymphoma, fibrosarcoma, multiple myeloma, and prostate cancer suggest other mechanisms for the anti-neoplastic activity of PIs. However, a major drawback for the possible adoption of HIV-PIs in the therapy of cancer relies on their relatively weak anticancer potency, and important side effects. This has propelled several groups to generate derivatives of HIV-PIs for anticancer use, through modifications such as attachment of different moieties, ligands, and transporters, including saquinavir-loaded folic acid conjugated nanoparticles and nitric oxide (NO) derivatives of HIV-PIs. In this paper, we discuss the current preclinical and clinical evidences for the potential use of HIV-PIs, and of novel derivatives, such as saquinavir-NO in the treatment of cancer. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 27 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 30 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2017.
All research outputs
#18,546,002
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Cancer
#10,436
of 11,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,423
of 417,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Cancer
#59
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.