↓ Skip to main content

Effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontal tissues

Overview of attention for article published in Periodontology 2000, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
364 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontal tissues
Published in
Periodontology 2000, April 2017
DOI 10.1111/prd.12194
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reduced periodontal support is a challenge that clinicians often face during rehabilitation of compromised dentition. The close and intricate relationship between the periodontal tissues and the processes of tooth movement suggest that adjunct orthodontic therapy may play an important role in overcoming these problems. On the other hand, excessive movement of teeth beyond the anatomic boundaries of the alveolar process is commonly believed to contribute to further destruction of the periodontal tissues. This review evaluates the clinical effects of various orthodontic tooth movements on the surrounding periodontal soft tissues and alveolar bone. Another objective was to identify possible patient and treatment-related factors that may influence the response of periodontal tissue to specific orthodontic treatments. Particular emphasis is placed on specific tooth movements, such as extrusion, intrusion, space closure and arch expansion. Limitations of current research are also highlighted and discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 364 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 363 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 70 19%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 4%
Other 39 11%
Unknown 157 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 188 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 158 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2017.
All research outputs
#21,981,335
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Periodontology 2000
#424
of 503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,583
of 314,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Periodontology 2000
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.