↓ Skip to main content

EthnoNotes: An Internet-Based Field Note Management Tool

Overview of attention for article published in Field Methods, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
EthnoNotes: An Internet-Based Field Note Management Tool
Published in
Field Methods, November 2003
DOI 10.1177/1525822x03257387
Authors

Eli Lieber, Thomas S. Weisner, Matthew Presley

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Romania 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
France 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Chile 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 49 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Professor 7 12%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2026.
All research outputs
#11,674,892
of 33,151,542 outputs
Outputs from Field Methods
#187
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,644
of 78,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Field Methods
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,151,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.