↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for optimizing design and analysis of clinical studies of nutrient effects

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Reviews, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
5 Redditors
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Guidelines for optimizing design and analysis of clinical studies of nutrient effects
Published in
Nutrition Reviews, December 2013
DOI 10.1111/nure.12090
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 136 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Other 9 6%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2025.
All research outputs
#843,330
of 33,143,744 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Reviews
#301
of 2,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,454
of 366,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Reviews
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,143,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.