↓ Skip to main content

Cutting Edge: Expression of FcγRIIB Tempers Memory CD8 T Cell Function In Vivo

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Immunology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cutting Edge: Expression of FcγRIIB Tempers Memory CD8 T Cell Function In Vivo
Published in
The Journal of Immunology, January 2014
DOI 10.4049/jimmunol.1302232
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

During reinfection, high-affinity IgG Abs form complexes with both soluble Ag and Ag displayed on the surface of infected cells. These interactions regulate cellular activation of both innate cells and B cells, which express specific combinations of activating FcγRs (FcγRI, FcγRIII, FcγRIV) and/or the inhibitory FcγR (FcγRIIB). Direct proof for functional expression of FcγR by Ag-specific CD8 T cells is lacking. In this article, we show that the majority of memory CD8 T cells generated by bacterial or viral infection express only FcγRIIB, and that FcγRIIB could be detected on previously activated human CD8 T cells. Of note, FcγR stimulation during in vivo Ag challenge not only inhibited the cytotoxicity of memory CD8 T cells against peptide-loaded or virus-infected targets, but FcγRIIB blockade during homologous virus challenge enhanced the secondary CD8 T cell response. Thus, memory CD8 T cells intrinsically express a functional FcγRIIB, permitting Ag-Ab complexes to regulate secondary CD8 T cell responses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Philosophy 1 2%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,330,127
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Immunology
#16,016
of 19,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,187
of 305,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Immunology
#70
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.