↓ Skip to main content

Octreotide Is Ineffective in Treating Tumor‐Induced Osteomalacia: Results of a Short‐Term Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Octreotide Is Ineffective in Treating Tumor‐Induced Osteomalacia: Results of a Short‐Term Therapy
Published in
Journal of Bone & Mineral Research, April 2017
DOI 10.1002/jbmr.3162
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome in which unregulated hypersecretion of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) by phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors (PMT) causes renal phosphate wasting, hypophosphatemia, and osteomalacia. The resulting mineral homeostasis abnormalities and skeletal manifestations can be reversed with surgical resection of the tumor. Unfortunately, PMTs are often difficult to locate, and medical treatment with oral phosphate and vitamin D analogues is either insufficient to manage the disease or not tolerated. Octreotide has been proposed as a potential treatment for TIO due to the presence of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) on PMTs, however the role of somatostatin signaling in PMTs and the efficacy of treatment of TIOs with somatostatin analogues is not clear. In an effort to evaluate the efficacy of octreotide therapy in TIO, 5 subjects with TIO were treated with octreotide for 3 days. Blood intact FGF23, phosphate and 1,25(OH)2 D3 , and tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TRP) were measured at frequent time points during treatment. Octreotide's effects were assessed by comparing group means of the biochemical parameters at each time point to mean baseline values. There were no significant changes in blood phosphate, FGF23, 1,25(OH)2 D3 , or TRP during octreotide treatment, consistent with a lack of efficacy of octreotide in treating TIO. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Other 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#28,640,276
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#5,377
of 5,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,873
of 356,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone & Mineral Research
#75
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.