↓ Skip to main content

Polytetrafluoroethylene topographies determine the adhesion, activation, and foreign body giant cell formation of macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Polytetrafluoroethylene topographies determine the adhesion, activation, and foreign body giant cell formation of macrophages
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, June 2017
DOI 10.1002/jbm.a.36099
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is one of the commonly used materials in making various cardiovascular implants. However, the success rates of these implants in several occasions is hindered by unwanted immune responses from immune cells, such as macrophages. In this study, we investigated the response of macrophages with different structures (flat, expanded, and electrospun) of PTFE having varied surface topographies: smooth planar surface (flat PTFE), node-fibrils (ePTFE), and randomly oriented micro fibers (electrospun PTFE). The electrospun PTFE showed the least adhesion of macrophages. Also, the morphology of macrophages adhered on electrospun PTFE exhibited minimal activation. The macrophage pro-inflammatory cytokine secretions showed that the lowest level of TNF-α was produced on electrospun PTFE whereas IP-10 was produced in lowest levels on expanded PTFE (ePTFE). The production of IL-6 and MCP-1 cytokines was also dependent on the structure of PTFE that the macrophages interacted with, but in a time dependent manner. Confocal microscopy images taken at 7, 14, and 21 days showed that the electrospun PTFE resulted in the lowest percentage of macrophage fusion, thus indicating the least possible chance of foreign body giant cell (FBGC) formation. Therefore, this study showed that electrospun PTFE with randomly oriented micro fibers can provide reduced adhesion, activation, and FBGC formation of macrophages compared to the smooth and planar surface of flat PTFE and node-fibril structured surface of ePTFE. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Materials Science 4 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2017.
All research outputs
#31,265,400
of 34,451,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#3,162
of 3,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,575
of 365,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#38
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,451,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.