↓ Skip to main content

Genetic Differences among C57BL/6 Substrains

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental animals, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
565 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic Differences among C57BL/6 Substrains
Published in
Experimental animals, January 2009
DOI 10.1538/expanim.58.141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuyuki MEKADA, Kuniya ABE, Ayumi MURAKAMI, Satoe NAKAMURA, Hatsumi NAKATA, Kazuo MORIWAKI, Yuichi OBATA, Atsushi YOSHIKI

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 565 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
Germany 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 534 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 24%
Researcher 122 22%
Student > Bachelor 63 11%
Student > Master 56 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 6%
Other 74 13%
Unknown 80 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 199 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 100 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 10%
Neuroscience 48 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 5%
Other 41 7%
Unknown 91 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,215,378
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Experimental animals
#61
of 388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,619
of 185,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental animals
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 388 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.