↓ Skip to main content

Voriconazole-Associated Cutaneous Malignancy: A Literature Review on Photocarcinogenesis in Organ Transplant Recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Voriconazole-Associated Cutaneous Malignancy: A Literature Review on Photocarcinogenesis in Organ Transplant Recipients
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, December 2013
DOI 10.1093/cid/cit940
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This article synthesizes the current data regarding the implication of voriconazole in the development of skin cancer in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) and offers suggestions for additional research. According to Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, 28 051 solid organ transplants were performed in 2012. Due to advancements in immunosuppression and management of infectious diseases, survival of OTRs has substantially increased. Voriconazole is a widely prescribed antifungal medication used for prophylaxis and for treatment of invasive fungal infections in OTRs. Case reports describing skin cancer associated with voriconazole exposure emerged shortly after US Food and Drug Administration approval of the drug, and it is now established that voriconazole is an independent risk factor for the development of cutaneous malignancy in lung transplant recipients. The mechanism of voriconazole-induced skin cancer is still unknown and may involve its primary metabolite, voriconazole N-oxide. Here we discuss the current data and potential mechanisms of voriconazole-associated photosensitivity and carcinogenesis and identify areas that require further research.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 13%
Researcher 10 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Master 4 5%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2024.
All research outputs
#3,970,495
of 29,868,835 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#6,822
of 19,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,357
of 337,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#53
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,868,835 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.