↓ Skip to main content

Cross-reactivity in fish allergy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled food-challenge trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cross-reactivity in fish allergy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled food-challenge trial
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.043
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

One third of fish-allergic patients tolerate at least one fish species. Specific IgE testing can identify most patients with fish allergy and reduce the need of oral challenges in the diagnostic work-up.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 11 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,285,901
of 34,546,575 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#1,082
of 14,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,065
of 356,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#27
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,546,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.