↓ Skip to main content

Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Neurosciences, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
1103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age
Published in
Trends in Neurosciences, November 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.tins.2013.10.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Light is a potent stimulus for regulating circadian, hormonal, and behavioral systems. In addition, light therapy is effective for certain affective disorders, sleep problems, and circadian rhythm disruption. These biological and behavioral effects of light are influenced by a distinct photoreceptor in the eye, melanopsin-containing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), in addition to conventional rods and cones. We summarize the neurophysiology of this newly described sensory pathway and consider implications for the measurement, production, and application of light. A new light-measurement strategy taking account of the complex photoreceptive inputs to these non-visual responses is proposed for use by researchers, and simple suggestions for artificial/architectural lighting are provided for regulatory authorities, lighting manufacturers, designers, and engineers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 1071 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 172 16%
Researcher 157 14%
Student > Master 147 13%
Student > Bachelor 76 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 4%
Other 204 18%
Unknown 301 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 140 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 9%
Neuroscience 88 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 70 6%
Design 68 6%
Other 273 25%
Unknown 364 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2026.
All research outputs
#701,874
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Neurosciences
#137
of 2,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,954
of 372,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Neurosciences
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.