↓ Skip to main content

Cephalosporins Should Not Be The Preferred Empiric Oral Antibiotics for Treatment of Outpatient Acute Pyelonephritis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Emergency Medicine, August 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cephalosporins Should Not Be The Preferred Empiric Oral Antibiotics for Treatment of Outpatient Acute Pyelonephritis
Published in
Annals of Emergency Medicine, August 2026
DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2026.02.020
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allyson Greenberg, Joanne J Smith, Anne E Zepeski

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2026.
All research outputs
#22,127,034
of 33,223,351 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#6,617
of 8,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,114
of 132,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,223,351 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.