↓ Skip to main content

Suicide prevention in mental health services: A qualitative analysis of coroners’ reports

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
27 X users

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Suicide prevention in mental health services: A qualitative analysis of coroners’ reports
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, May 2017
DOI 10.1111/inm.12349
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Suicide is a major concern for mental health nurses because of its clear correlation with mental illness. In New Zealand, coroners investigate all deaths that appear to be a result of suicide, and provide reports to mental health services (MHS). The aim of the present study was to investigate coronial recommendations to MHS in relation to suicide prevention and to examine clinical and family responses to these. The present study was a three-phase design: (i) analysis of coroners' recommendations related to suicide in MHS; (ii) interviews with clinicians for their response to the recommendations; and (iii) interviews with individuals working with families of consumers of MHS for their responses in relation to family-related recommendations. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on the recommendations from coroners, the interviews with clinical leaders, and the focus group for family workers. Coroners recommended that MHS should implement suicide-prevention strategies that would facilitate improved communication, risk containment, service delivery, and family involvement. Clinicians agreed with most recommendations, apart from those related to risk containment. Family workers endorsed the coronial perspective that family inclusion in MHS was suboptimal. Coroners, MHS, and mental health nurses need to consider the latest clinical evidence for suicide prevention. However, given the complexity of factors that influence suicide, it is important to be realistic about MHS role in preventing suicide, but ensure that MHS provide interventions for which there is evidence, including facilitating family participation and providing access to psychotherapies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 32 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Psychology 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 35 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,481,166
of 34,565,638 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
#239
of 1,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,011
of 357,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,565,638 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.