↓ Skip to main content

Causes and Predictors of 30-Day Readmissions in Atrial Fibrillation (from the Nationwide Readmissions Database)

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Cardiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Causes and Predictors of 30-Day Readmissions in Atrial Fibrillation (from the Nationwide Readmissions Database)
Published in
American Journal of Cardiology, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.040
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cause of arrhythmia-related hospitalizations. We assessed 30-day readmissions in patients admitted with AF in a national sample of US population. Data were extracted from Nationwide Readmissions Database for the calendar year 2013. Patients with primary discharge diagnosis of AF were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, code 427.31. Patients who died during hospitalization and those <18 years were excluded. Our primary outcome was 30-day readmission rate. Causes and independent predictors of 30-day readmissions were examined. We identified 388,340 patients admitted with AF, of whom 58,634 patients (15.1%) were readmitted within 30 days. Patients who were readmitted tended to be older and have a higher burden of co-morbidities. AF and heart failure were the main causes of 30-day readmissions in our cohort. Advanced age, female gender, and multiple co-morbidities were independently associated with 30-day readmissions. In conclusion, 15% of patients admitted for AF were readmitted within 30 days. More than 1/3 of these readmissions were for AF or heart failure.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 18 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,448,392
of 34,826,519 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Cardiology
#860
of 16,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,421
of 357,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Cardiology
#15
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,826,519 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.