↓ Skip to main content

Missense variant in TREML2 protects against Alzheimer's disease

Overview of attention for article published in Neurobiology of Aging, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Missense variant in TREML2 protects against Alzheimer's disease
Published in
Neurobiology of Aging, December 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.12.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

TREM and TREM-like receptors are a structurally similar protein family encoded by genes clustered on chromosome 6p21.11. Recent studies have identified a rare coding variant (p.R47H) in TREM2 that confers a high risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). In addition, common single nucleotide polymorphisms in this genomic region are associated with cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for AD and a common intergenic variant found near the TREML2 gene has been identified to be protective for AD. However, little is known about the functional variant underlying the latter association or its relationship with the p.R47H. Here, we report comprehensive analyses using whole-exome sequencing data, cerebrospinal fluid biomarker analyses, meta-analyses (16,254 cases and 20,052 controls) and cell-based functional studies to support the role of the TREML2 coding missense variant p.S144G (rs3747742) as a potential driver of the meta-analysis AD-associated genome-wide association studies signal. Additionally, we demonstrate that the protective role of TREML2 in AD is independent of the role of TREM2 gene as a risk factor for AD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 201 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 17%
Professor 13 6%
Other 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 45 21%
Unknown 52 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 18%
Neuroscience 35 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Psychology 9 4%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 60 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,766,880
of 30,539,290 outputs
Outputs from Neurobiology of Aging
#3,548
of 4,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,884
of 346,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurobiology of Aging
#36
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,539,290 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.