↓ Skip to main content

R‐wave Amplitude in Lead II of an Electrocardiograph Correlates with Central Hypovolemia in Human Beings

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Emergency Medicine, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
R‐wave Amplitude in Lead II of an Electrocardiograph Correlates with Central Hypovolemia in Human Beings
Published in
Academic Emergency Medicine, June 2008
DOI 10.1197/j.aem.2006.07.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous animal and human experiments have suggested that reduction in central blood volume either increases or decreases the amplitude of R waves in various electrocardiograph (ECG) leads depending on underlying pathophysiology. In this investigation, we used graded central hypovolemia in adult volunteer subjects to test the hypothesis that moderate reductions in central blood volume increases R-wave amplitude in lead II of an ECG.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Engineering 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2019.
All research outputs
#10,120,774
of 31,301,153 outputs
Outputs from Academic Emergency Medicine
#2,439
of 4,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,477
of 120,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Emergency Medicine
#396
of 733 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,301,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 733 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.