↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Body mass index and vigorous physical activity in children and adolescents: an international cross‐sectional study
Published in
Acta Paediatrica, June 2017
DOI 10.1111/apa.13903
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To examine the relationship between reported vigorous physical activity (VPA) and body mass index (BMI) in children (6-7 years) and adolescents (13-14 years). In the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood Phase Three, 75,895 children's parents and 199,502 adolescents answered questions relating to VPA, height and weight. The association between VPA and BMI was analysed using general linear models, adjusting for country gross national index. Compared to children who undertook no VPA, those in the infrequent group (once or twice per week) and those in the frequent group (three or more times per week) had mean (95%CI) BMI values 0.07 kg/m(2) (0.03 to 0.11) and 0.09 kg/m(2) (0.03 to 0.15) greater respectively (P=0.001). Compared to adolescents reporting no VPA, those in the infrequent group had a BMI 0.19 kg/m(2) (0.15 to 0.23) greater while those in the frequent group had a BMI 0.01 kg/m(2) (-0.03 to 0.05) greater (P<0.0001). Reported VPA is not associated with lower BMI among children and adolescents. Investigation of VPA and BMI may be best undertaken in conjunction with other variables in the energy expenditure equation. A focus on VPA alone may be an inefficient way to manage BMI This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Professor 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 24 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 26%
Sports and Recreations 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Psychology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 27 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,183,973
of 24,811,707 outputs
Outputs from Acta Paediatrica
#4,633
of 5,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,778
of 322,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Paediatrica
#46
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.