↓ Skip to main content

Prooxidant–antioxidant balance, hsTnI and hsCRP: mortality prediction in haemodialysis patients, two-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Renal Failure, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prooxidant–antioxidant balance, hsTnI and hsCRP: mortality prediction in haemodialysis patients, two-year follow-up
Published in
Renal Failure, May 2017
DOI 10.1080/0886022x.2017.1323645
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanja Antunovic, Aleksandra Stefanovic, Najdana Gligorovic Barhanovic, Milica Miljkovic, Danilo Radunovic, Jasmina Ivanisevic, Vladimir Prelevic, Nebojsa Bulatovic, Marina Ratkovic, Marina Stojanov

Abstract

Oxidative stress and inflammation are highly intertwined pathophysiological processes. We analyzed the markers of these processes and high-sensitive troponin I (hsTnI) for mortality prediction in patients on haemodialysis. This study enrolled a total of 62 patients on regular haemodialysis. The patients were monitored for two years, and the observed outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Blood samples were taken before one dialysis session for analysis of the baseline concentrations of prooxidant-antioxidant balance (PAB), total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidative status (TOS), hsTnI, hsCRP and resistin. The overall all-cause mortality was 37.1% and CVD mortality 16.1%. By univariate and multivariate logistic regression, our findings suggest that good predictors of all-cause mortality include hsCRP and PAB (p < .05) and of CVD mortality hsCRP (p < .05) and hsTnI (p < .001). To evaluate the relationship between the combined parameter measurements and all-cause/CVD mortality risk, patients were divided into three groups according to their PAB, hsCRP and hsTnI concentrations. The cutoffs for hsCRP and hsTnI and the median for PAB were used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves pointed out that the highest mortality risk of all-cause mortality was in the group with hsCRP levels above the cutoff and PAB levels above the median (p < .001). The highest risk of CVD mortality was found in the group with hsCRP and hsTnI levels above the cutoff levels (p = .001). Our data suggest that hsCRP and PAB are very good predictors of all-cause mortality. For CVD complications and mortality prediction in HD patients, the most sensitive parameters appear to be hsTnI and hsCRP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,420,242
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Renal Failure
#677
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,643
of 310,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Renal Failure
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.