↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 648)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Efficient method to create integration-free, virus-free, Myc and Lin28-free human induced pluripotent stem cells from adherent cells
Published in
Future Science OA, May 2017
DOI 10.4155/fsoa-2017-0028
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Nonviral induced pluripotent stem cell (IPSC) reprogramming is not efficient without the oncogenes, Myc and Lin28. We describe a robust Myc and Lin28-free IPSC reprogramming approach using reprogramming molecules. IPSC colony formation was compared in the presence and absence of Myc and Lin28 by the mixture of reprogramming molecules and episomal vectors. While more colonies were observed in cultures transfected with the aforementioned oncogenes, the Myc and Lin28-free method achieved the same reprogramming efficiency as reports that used these oncogenes. Further, all colonies were fully reprogrammed based on expression of SSEA4, even in the absence of Myc and Lin28. This approach satisfies an important regulatory pathway for developing IPSC cell therapies with lower clinical risk.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 6 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,196,316
of 33,977,172 outputs
Outputs from Future Science OA
#32
of 648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,024
of 354,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Future Science OA
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,977,172 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.