↓ Skip to main content

Vaccination Against Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Infectious Diseases, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Vaccination Against Staphylococcus aureus Pneumonia
Published in
Journal of Infectious Diseases, December 2013
DOI 10.1093/infdis/jit823
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus causes serious infections in both hospital and community settings. Attempts have been made to prevent human infection through vaccination against bacterial cell-surface antigens; thus far all have failed. Here we show that superantigens and cytolysins, when used in vaccine cocktails, provide protection from S. aureus USA100-USA400 intrapulmonary challenge.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Taiwan 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 83 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,570,335
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#2,326
of 19,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,349
of 376,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infectious Diseases
#20
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.