↓ Skip to main content

MnO2 Nanotube-Based NanoSearchlight for Imaging of Multiple MicroRNAs in Live Cells

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
MnO2 Nanotube-Based NanoSearchlight for Imaging of Multiple MicroRNAs in Live Cells
Published in
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, July 2017
DOI 10.1021/acsami.6b15387
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sensitive assay and imaging of multiple low-abundance microRNAs (miRNAs) in living cells remain a grand challenge. Herein, based on polyelectrolyte induced reduction, a facile approach has been proposed to synthesize novel MnO2 nanotubes. Owing to the remarkably strong fluorescence quenching ability, low cytotoxicity and excellent colloid stability, the as-prepared MnO2 nanotubes showed great potential for simultaneous detection and imaging of multiple miRNAs in vitro and in situ in living cells for the first time. Besides, MnO2 nanotubes can be reduced to Mn2+ by intracellular acid pH or glutathione, which may serve as activatable contrast reagent for MRI. Therefore, the MnO2 nanotubes based probes, termed "NanoSearchlight", provide a promising, multimodal imaging tool for precise and accurate diagnosis and prognosis of cancers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Materials Science 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,408,174
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#9,377
of 17,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,515
of 313,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#198
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.