↓ Skip to main content

Red blood cell transfusion in clinical practice

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
13 patents
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Red blood cell transfusion in clinical practice
Published in
The Lancet, August 2007
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61197-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Brazil 5 1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 412 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 61 14%
Researcher 60 14%
Other 53 12%
Student > Bachelor 41 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 8%
Other 115 26%
Unknown 73 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 250 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 1%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 90 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2025.
All research outputs
#2,842,607
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#15,978
of 50,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,545
of 104,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#70
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,817 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.