↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantifying effects of abiotic and biotic drivers on community dynamics with multivariate autoregressive (MAR) models
Published in
Ecology, December 2013
DOI 10.1890/13-0996.1
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Long-term ecological data sets present opportunities for identifying drivers of community dynamics and quantifying their effects through time series analysis. Multivariate autoregressive (MAR) models are well known in many other disciplines, such as econometrics, but widespread adoption of MAR methods in ecology and natural resource management has been much slower despite some widely cited ecological examples. Here we review previous ecological applications of MAR models and highlight their ability to identify abiotic and biotic drivers of population dynamics, as well as community-level stability metrics, from long-term empirical observations. Thus far, MAR models have been used mainly with data from freshwater plankton communities; we examine the obstacles that may be hindering adoption in other systems and suggest practical modifications that will improve MAR models for broader application. Many of these modifications are already well known in other fields in which MAR models are common, although they are frequently described under different names. In an effort to make MAR models more accessible to ecologists, we include a worked example using recently developed R packages (MAR1 and MARSS), freely available and open-access software.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
Japan 2 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 211 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 22%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 26 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 42%
Environmental Science 68 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 36 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2024.
All research outputs
#10,268,384
of 34,271,801 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#3,696
of 8,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,266
of 377,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#26
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,271,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.