↓ Skip to main content

Biologic response modifiers: Indications, implications, and insights

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Biologic response modifiers: Indications, implications, and insights
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The field of biologic immune-modulators is currently mushrooming at a dizzying pace. While most of these biologics are tested and approved for one or a few indications, their un-anticipated side effects and their off-label use have contributed significantly to our understanding of basic immune mechanisms, of the involvement of cytokines in several apparently non-immunologic diseases, and of the importance of compartmentalized immune responses. In this review, we attempt to give a bird's-eye view of the major biologics and to highlight insights and implications derived from their secondary effects and adverse reactions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Researcher 10 12%
Other 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 21 24%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 26 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,615,312
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#5,901
of 14,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,617
of 352,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#109
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.