↓ Skip to main content

Free hernia surgery for the underserved is possible in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Hernia, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Free hernia surgery for the underserved is possible in the United States
Published in
Hernia, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10029-013-1198-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Losey-Flores, R. Benzar, J. M. Chan, S. Go, A. Montoure, K. K. Phillips, R. J. Fitzgibbons, K. Nandipati, T. Lee, H. Dethlefs, J. Manion, C. J. Filipi

Abstract

Inguinal hernia is one of the most common ailments known to mankind. When symptomatic it can severely affect the patient's quality of life. Nevertheless, the vast majority of inguinal herniorrhaphies are elective and, therefore, not available to uninsured patients who do not have the financial wherewithal to pay for the operation. Using the Surgery on Sunday model developed in Kentucky, hernia repair for the underserved developed a free clinic for hernia surgery, based on institutional commitment to the poor as well as the volunteer efforts of medical students and hospital personnel at all levels.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2014.
All research outputs
#21,955,726
of 34,444,361 outputs
Outputs from Hernia
#999
of 1,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,092
of 374,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hernia
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,444,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.