↓ Skip to main content

Teeth contacting habit as a contributing factor to chronic pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of medical and dental sciences, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Teeth contacting habit as a contributing factor to chronic pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders
Published in
Journal of medical and dental sciences, October 2016
DOI 10.11480/jmds.530203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fumiaki Sato, Koji Kino, Masashi Sugisaki, Tadasu Haketa, Yoko Amemori, Takayuki Ishikawa, Toshihisa Shibuya, Teruo Amagasa, Tomoaki Shibuya, Haruyasu Tanabe, Tetsuya Yoda, Ichiro Sakamoto, Ken Omura, Hitoshi Miyaoka

Abstract

Many different factors are known to cause and perpetuate the symptoms of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). However, the roles of parafunctional factors have not been clearly elucidated. We found one of these habits in the clinical setting. This parafunctional habit involves daily light touching of the upper and lower teeth, when the mouth is closed. We named this habit Teeth Contacting Habit (TCH). [OBJECTIVES] To investigate the following hypotheses: 1) TCH is associated with perpetuation of chronic pain of TMD patients; 2) TCH is associated with other behavioral factors. [METHODS] Two hundred and twenty-nine TMD outpatients with chronic pain were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression models. [RESULTS] TCH was found in 52.4% of patients. Patients with TCH and pain lasting for more than four months were less likely to experience improvements in pain at the first visit (OR = 1.944, p = 0.043). Other factors associated with TCH were as follows: unilateral chewing (OR = 2.802) and involvement in a precision job (OR = 2.195). [CONCLUSION] TCH can prolong TMD pain and is associated with other behavioral factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Hong Kong 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Lecturer 7 8%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2022.
All research outputs
#15,226,609
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of medical and dental sciences
#14
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,241
of 322,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of medical and dental sciences
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.