↓ Skip to main content

Trimethylguanosine Synthase1 (TGS1) Is Essential for Chilling Tolerance

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Physiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Trimethylguanosine Synthase1 (TGS1) Is Essential for Chilling Tolerance
Published in
Plant Physiology, May 2017
DOI 10.1104/pp.17.00340
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chilling stress is a major factor limiting plant development and crop productivity. Because the plant response to chilling is so complex, we are far from understanding the genes important in the response to chilling. To identify new genes important in chilling tolerance we conducted a novel mutant screen, combining a confirmed SALK T-DNA insertion collection with traditional forward genetics. We screened a pool of more than 3700 confirmed homozygous SALK T-DNA insertion lines for visible defects under prolonged growth at 5{degree sign}C. Of the chilling-sensitive mutants we observed, mutations at one locus were characterized in detail. This gene, At1g45231, encodes an Arabidopsis trimethylguanosine synthase (TGS1), previously uncharacterized in the plant kingdom. We confirmed that Arabidopsis TGS1 was a functional orthologue of other trimethylguanosine synthases based both on its in vitro methyltransferase activity, and on its ability to rescue the cold-growth inhibition of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae tgs1Δ mutant in vivo. While tgs1 mutant plants grew normally at 22{degree sign}C, their vegetative and reproductive growth was severely compromised under chilling conditions. When we transgenically expressed TGS1 in the mutant plants, the chilling-sensitive phenotype was relieved, demonstrating that TGS1 is required for chilling tolerance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 24%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2017.
All research outputs
#22,698,204
of 27,788,362 outputs
Outputs from Plant Physiology
#12,468
of 13,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,067
of 331,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Physiology
#127
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.