↓ Skip to main content

68Ga-DOTATOC Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Medicine, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
68Ga-DOTATOC Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, March 2017
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.117.191197
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

(68)Ga-DOTATOC, a somatostatin receptor targeted ligand, has been used clinically in Europe over the past decade for imaging neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). It appears to be quite sensitive and effective for clinical management decision-making. This meta-analysis summarizes the efficacy of (68)Ga-DOTATOC for several distinct indications and is intended to support approval of this agent by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Methods: The major electronic medical databases were searched for relevant papers over the period from January 2001 until November 2015. Papers were selected for review in 3 categories: clinical trials that reported sensitivity and specificity, comparison studies with (111)In-octreotide, and change of management studies. All the eligible papers underwent Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) assessment, which was useful in the final selection of papers for review. Results: The initial search yielded 468 papers. After detailed evaluation, 17 papers were finally selected. Five types of studies emerged: workup of patients with symptoms and biomarker findings suggestive of NET, but with negative conventional imaging (3 papers, yield was only 13%); sensitivity (12 papers, sensitivity 92%,) and specificity (7 papers, specificity 82%); identification of site of unknown primary in patients with metastatic NET (4 papers, yield was 44%); impact on subsequent NET patient management (4 papers - change in management in 51%); and comparison with (111)In-octreotide (2 papers, sensitivity of DOTATOC on a per lesion basis was 100%,for (111)In-octreotide was 78.2%; specificity was not available). Safety was not explicitly addressed in any study, but there were no reports of adverse events. Conclusion:(68)Ga-DOTATOC is useful for evaluating the presence and extent in disease for staging, restaging, and to assist in treatment decision making for patients with NET. It is also effective in locating the site of an unknown primary in NET patients that present with metastatic NET, but no known primary tumor. It also appears to be more accurate than (111)In-octreotide. Although (68)Ga-DOTATOC would seem to be useful in evaluating patients with suggestive symptoms and biomarker findings, it does not perform well in this setting and has low yield. Overall, it appears to be an excellent imaging agent to assess patients with known NET and frequently leads to a change in management.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Other 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Researcher 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 40 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 33%
Chemistry 15 12%
Engineering 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 48 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2026.
All research outputs
#7,884,263
of 29,583,705 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#2,213
of 5,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,173
of 330,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#38
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,583,705 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.