You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Immune plasma for the treatment of severe influenza: an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 randomised study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2213-2600(17)30174-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John H Beigel, Pablo Tebas, Marie-Carmelle Elie-Turenne, Ednan Bajwa, Todd E Bell, Charles B Cairns, Shmuel Shoham, Jaime G Deville, Eric Feucht, Judith Feinberg, Thomas Luke, Kanakatte Raviprakash, Janine Danko, Dorothy O'Neil, Julia A Metcalf, Karen King, Timothy H Burgess, Evgenia Aga, H Clifford Lane, Michael D Hughes, Richard T Davey, IRC002 Study Team, Pablo Tebas, Joseph Quinn, Yan Jiang, Marie-Carmelle Elie-Turenne, Robyn Hoelle, Nicole Iovine, Robert Shawn Wills, Socorro Pata, Monique Huggins, Belinda Manukian, Ednan Bajwa, Carrie Holland, Kelsey Brait, Taylor Hunt, Christopher Stowell, Amy Slater, Todd E Bell, Mary Townsends, Charles B Cairns, Eugenia B Quackenbush, Yara A Park, Paul Gaither Jordan, Cherie Blanchet, Kevin Chronowski, Kathleen Alvarez, Shmuel Shoham, Darin Ostrander, Terry Woessner, Sandra Thoman, Jaime G Deville, James Lin, Alyssa Ziman, Kavita Shankar, Eric Feucht, Tom Blok, Don Batts, Bob Beck, Gail Massey, Carol Bradley, Judith Feinberg, Patricia Carey, Jenifer Baer, Eva Moore Whitehead, Sharon Kohrs, Robert Giulitto, Christina Schofield, Mary Fairchok, Susan Chambers, Cindy Baker, RN, Michelle Parker, Marta Harshbarger, M Hong Nguyen, Mary Ellen Carey, Julie Paronish, Frank Cornell, Jim Cramer, Diana Lynn Pakstis, Michael G Ison, Richard Wunderink, Marshall Glesby, Kirsis Ham, Valery Hughes, Melissa Cushing, Cheryl Goss, Joanne Grenade, Pauline K Park, Lena M Napolitano, Krishnan Raghavendran, Robert C Hyzy, Robertson Davenport, Kristin Brierley, Theresa Downs, Michelle Ng Gong, Joan Uehlinger, Michael Lin, Janice Fritsche, Tondria Green, Bruce McLeod, Deena Patel, Mary F Bavaro, Robert Deiss, Carolyn Brandt, Stephanie Cammarata, Allan Kremp, Karine Hollis-Perry, Tahaniyat Lalani, Susan Banks, Jacqueline Johnson, Jason Maguire, Janet McNiff, Leslie E Rigg, Anuradha Ganesan, Irma Barahona, Janine Danko, Steven Spencer, David Stagliano, Timothy Burgess, Daniel Talmor, Monique Mohammed, Valerie Banner-Goodspeed, Robert Salata, Robert Finberg, Jennifer Wang, Karen Longtine, Jaclyn Longtine, Mellissa O'Neil, Philippe R Bauer, Ognjen Gajic, Suanne M Weist, Jonathan Sevransky, Mona Brown, John Roback, John Oropello, Bridget Twohig, Jeffrey Jhang, Rahgu Seethala, Wilbur H Chen, Magali Fontaine, Kapil Saharia, Jennifer Husson, Roberta DeBiasi, Jurran L Wilson, Valli Ree Criss, Jocelyn Voell, Susan Leitman, James Wade Atkins, Hemaxi Patel, Traci Paige, Cathy Cantilena, Donald Siegel, Faye DeMuth, Craig H Fletcher, J Peter R Pelletier, Hassan Alnuaimat, Michelle Pourde |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| Australia | 3 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 55 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#1,784,456
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#1,024
of 3,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,182
of 353,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#11
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.