↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Immunization Data Completeness Within a Large Community Health Care System Exchanging Data With a State Immunization Information System

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluation of Immunization Data Completeness Within a Large Community Health Care System Exchanging Data With a State Immunization Information System
Published in
Journal of Public Health Management & Practice, May 2015
DOI 10.1097/phh.0000000000000045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bryan K. Hendrickson, Sarada S. Panchanathan, Diana Petitti

Abstract

Information systems are used by most states to maintain registries of immunization data both for monitoring population-level adherence and for use in clinical practice and research. Direct data exchange between such systems and electronic health record systems presents an opportunity to improve the completeness and quality of information available.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 45 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 17%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 11 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#11,929,160
of 34,454,098 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
#1,449
of 2,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,148
of 306,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Management & Practice
#12
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,454,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.