↓ Skip to main content

Causes and Contributing Factors to “Dark Cutting” Meat: Current Trends and Future Directions: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Causes and Contributing Factors to “Dark Cutting” Meat: Current Trends and Future Directions: A Review
Published in
Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety, March 2017
DOI 10.1111/1541-4337.12258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 235 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 88 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 35%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 15 6%
Engineering 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 105 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#24,098,275
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety
#928
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,829
of 352,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science & Food Safety
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.