↓ Skip to main content

Renesting by American Woodcocks (Scolopax minor) in Maine

Overview of attention for article published in Ornithology, April 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renesting by American Woodcocks (Scolopax minor) in Maine
Published in
Ornithology, April 1990
DOI 10.2307/4087628
Authors

Daniel G. McAuley, Jerry R. Longcore, Greg F. Sepik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 55%
Environmental Science 6 27%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Ornithology
#811
of 2,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,472
of 15,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.