↓ Skip to main content

A Role for Neuregulin-1 in Promoting Keloid Fibroblast Migration via ErbB2-mediated Signaling.

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Dermato-Venereologica, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Role for Neuregulin-1 in Promoting Keloid Fibroblast Migration via ErbB2-mediated Signaling.
Published in
Acta Dermato-Venereologica, January 2017
DOI 10.2340/00015555-2587
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Keloid disease is a fibroproliferative tumour characterised by aggressive local invasion, evident from a clinically and histologically active migrating margin. During combined laser capture microdissection and microarray analysis-based in situ gene expression profiling, we identified upregulation of the polypeptide growth factor neuregulin-1 (NRG1) and ErbB2 oncogene in keloid margin dermis, leading to the hypothesis that NRG1 contributed to keloid margin migration through ErbB2-mediated signalling. The aim of this study was to probe this hypothesis through functional in vitro studies. Exogenous NRG1 addition to keloid and normal skin fibroblasts altered cytokine expression profiles, significantly increased in vitro migration and keloid fibroblast Src and protein tyrosine kinase 2 (PTK2/FAK) gene expression. ErbB2 siRNA knockdown attenuated both keloid fibroblast migration and Src/PTK2 expression, which were not recovered following NRG1 administration, suggesting the NRG1/ErbB2/Src/PTK2 signaling pathway may be a novel regulator of keloid fibroblast migration, and representing a potential new therapeutic target.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Linguistics 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2017.
All research outputs
#27,877,056
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Acta Dermato-Venereologica
#2,590
of 3,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#354,479
of 463,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Dermato-Venereologica
#112
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.