↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of Torsade de Pointes From the QT Interval: Analysis of a Case Series of Amisulpride Overdoses

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prediction of Torsade de Pointes From the QT Interval: Analysis of a Case Series of Amisulpride Overdoses
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, June 2011
DOI 10.1038/clpt.2011.107
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) from a case series of 86 amisulpride overdose events in 66 patients were reviewed for abnormal QT intervals and torsade de pointes (TdP). Eight patients exhibited TdP. In this investigative case series, the magnitude of prolongation of the QT interval was a stronger predictor of TdP than the mere presence of a prolongation per se.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
India 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,192,587
of 28,812,439 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#608
of 5,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,081
of 137,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,812,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.