↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of work participation for Māori 3 months after injury

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predictors of work participation for Māori 3 months after injury
Published in
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health, June 2017
DOI 10.1080/19338244.2017.1329698
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

An important rehabilitation outcome for injured Māori is timely sustainable return to work. This paper identifies the factors influencing working after injury in an attempt to reduce the individual, social and economic costs. Māori participants in the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study were interviewed, about pre-injury and injury-related factors. Among Māori participants, 521 were working for pay prior to injury; 64% were working three months post-injury. Factors identified, using modified Poisson regression, that predicted working include: financial security (aRR = 1.34, 95%CI 1.12-1.61), an injury of low (aRR = 1.76, 95%CI 1.26-2.44) or moderate severity (aRR = 1.86, 95%CI 1.34-2.59), professional occupations (aRR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.03-1.44) and jobs with less repetitive hand movements (aRR = 1.17, 95%CI 1.01-1.34). These factors identified warrant attention when planning interventions to enable rehabilitation back to the workplace.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 9 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 29%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#31,191,732
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health
#338
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,623
of 365,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.