↓ Skip to main content

Experience teaches plants to learn faster and forget slower in environments where it matters

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 5,387)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
478 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Experience teaches plants to learn faster and forget slower in environments where it matters
Published in
Oecologia, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-013-2873-7
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The nervous system of animals serves the acquisition, memorization and recollection of information. Like animals, plants also acquire a huge amount of information from their environment, yet their capacity to memorize and organize learned behavioral responses has not been demonstrated. In Mimosa pudica-the sensitive plant-the defensive leaf-folding behaviour in response to repeated physical disturbance exhibits clear habituation, suggesting some elementary form of learning. Applying the theory and the analytical methods usually employed in animal learning research, we show that leaf-folding habituation is more pronounced and persistent for plants growing in energetically costly environments. Astonishingly, Mimosa can display the learned response even when left undisturbed in a more favourable environment for a month. This relatively long-lasting learned behavioural change as a result of previous experience matches the persistence of habituation effects observed in many animals.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 478 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Brazil 6 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 449 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 15%
Student > Bachelor 73 15%
Researcher 62 13%
Student > Master 52 11%
Other 24 5%
Other 83 17%
Unknown 110 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 167 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 6%
Environmental Science 29 6%
Psychology 28 6%
Neuroscience 15 3%
Other 82 17%
Unknown 126 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 690. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2026.
All research outputs
#38,188
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3
of 5,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221
of 372,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.