↓ Skip to main content

A Refutation of “Rent” in Technofeudalism and Knowledge-Commodity Theories: Toward a Theory of Surplus Profits

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Radical Political Economics, August 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
bluesky
1 Bluesky user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Refutation of “Rent” in Technofeudalism and Knowledge-Commodity Theories: Toward a Theory of Surplus Profits
Published in
Review of Radical Political Economics, August 2026
DOI 10.1177/04866134261452322
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2026.
All research outputs
#10,687,104
of 34,309,480 outputs
Outputs from Review of Radical Political Economics
#209
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,203
of 278,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Radical Political Economics
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,309,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.