↓ Skip to main content

Bridging the divide: global lessons from evidence-based health policy in Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
7 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
367 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bridging the divide: global lessons from evidence-based health policy in Mexico
Published in
The Lancet, September 2006
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69376-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

During the past 6 years, Mexico has undergone a large-scale transformation of its health system. This paper provides an overview of the main features of the Mexican reform experience. Because of its high degree of social inequality, Mexico is a microcosm of the range of problems that affect countries at all levels of development. Its health system had not kept up with the pressures of the double burden of disease, whereby malnutrition, common infections, and reproductive health problems coexist with non-communicable disease and injury. With half of its population uninsured, Mexico was facing an unacceptable paradox: whereas health is a key factor in the fight against poverty, a large number of families became impoverished by expenditures in health care and drugs. The reform was designed to correct this paradox by introducing a new scheme called Popular Health Insurance (Seguro Popular). This innovative initiative is gradually protecting the 50 million Mexicans, most of them poor, who had until now been excluded from formal social insurance. This paper reports encouraging results in the achievement of the ultimate objective of the reform: universal access to high-quality services with social protection for all.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Thailand 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 343 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 77 21%
Researcher 64 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 6%
Other 69 19%
Unknown 52 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 28%
Social Sciences 79 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 4%
Other 72 20%
Unknown 63 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2025.
All research outputs
#1,948,258
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#12,620
of 50,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,941
of 116,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#34
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.